Documentation

Whitepaper

The Post-Quantum Privacy Protocol—a comprehensive technical specification for quantum-resistant, privacy-preserving distributed ledger technology.

Implementation Guide

Detailed engineering specifications for building Po8 nodes, miners, and wallets. Includes code examples and architecture diagrams.

Technical Reference
View Specs

The Quadrilemma

The Po8 Network emerges as a direct architectural response to the "Quadrilemma"—the challenge of balancing scalability, security, and decentralization, while simultaneously solving for the fourth, often neglected pillar: long-term quantum resilience and metadata privacy.

1

Quantum Resistance at Depth

Total rejection of number-theoretic cryptography. The protocol replaces the entire cryptographic substrate with lattice-based primitives (ML-KEM and ML-DSA) as specified by NIST FIPS 203 and 204 standards.

2

NPU-Centric Consensus

Proof of Useful Work optimized for unified memory architectures of consumer edge devices. By exploiting the Batch-1 Efficiency Gap, Po8 demonetizes industrial mining farms.

3

Infrastructure-Level Privacy

Privacy treated as a transport-layer problem. Validators must relay bandwidth to participate in consensus—the privacy set scales linearly with network security.

4

Interoperability and Usability

Full EVM compatibility through the Quantum Abstraction Layer. Security does not come at the cost of usability.

Document Structure

1. Executive Strategic Overview

  • The Convergence of Existential Threats
  • The "Harvest Now, Decrypt Later" Threat Model
  • Architectural Philosophy: The Four Pillars
  • Stakeholder Impact and Design Goals

2. Post-Quantum Cryptographic Substrate

  • The Mathematical Shift: From Integers to Lattices
  • Selected Primitives: NIST Compliance
  • Hybrid Key Exchange
  • Implementation Fundamentals

3. NPU-Centric Consensus

  • The "Batch-1 Efficiency Gap" Thesis
  • TensorChain: Matrix-Based Proof of Work
  • The InferNet Layer: Useful Work
  • Security Model and Economic Defenses

4. Network Privacy Architecture

  • The Metadata Surveillance Gap
  • The Mixnet Architecture
  • The Decentralized VPN
  • The Bandwidth Market Economics

5. Ledger Privacy & Compliance

  • Zero-Knowledge Architecture: Halo2
  • Programmable Compliance: View Key Hierarchy
  • Institutional Privacy: zkLedger and VCs
  • Private Delegation: The Siniel Framework

6. Interoperability and Hardware

  • The Rust Node Architecture
  • The Quantum Abstraction Layer
  • Precompiles for Lattice Operations
  • Hardware Wallet Support

Why Now?

The "Harvest Now, Decrypt Later" Threat

State-level adversaries are currently engaged in bulk collection of encrypted internet traffic. This data is being stored in exabyte-scale facilities. Once a Cryptographically Relevant Quantum Computer comes online, this harvested data can be retroactively decrypted.

For a blockchain—an immutable, permanent record of value transfer—this is catastrophic. A transaction signed with ECDSA today will be visible to a quantum adversary ten years from now. The shelf-life of blockchain data necessitates an immediate migration to lattice-based cryptography.

Read the Full Specification

The complete whitepaper provides detailed mathematical foundations, security proofs, and implementation specifications.